Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99775 (MAD)

Inspector of Police v. Seeni

SUO MOTU TR/11456/2025 · 2025-10-07

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Suo Motu TR.No.11456 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.10.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Suo Motu TR.No.11456 of 2025 CC.No.800606 of 2015 Judicial Magistrate No.II, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishanagiri) State rep by The Sub Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri Town Police Station, Krishnagiri District. ... Petitioner Vs. Seeni @ Kili ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Govt. Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER This Suo Motu Case is dealt with in an extraordinary manner by the Dedicated Bench, pursuant to Suo Motu W.P.(Crl.) No.618 of 2025. 2.The case in C.C.No.606 of 2016 was taken on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishanagiri for the alleged offence under Sections 379 of I.P.C. The occurrence is said to have taken place on 21.09.2009. The accused committed theft of gas cylinder of the de- facto complainant. It is reported that the gas cylinder has been recovered and Page No.1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Suo Motu TR.No.11456 of 2025 returned to the de-complainant. It is submitted by the de-facto complainant that he doesn't want to pursue the matter further. 3.Considering the factual matrix, context of the case, the reason for absence from his usual place, and the submission that, despite best efforts, the warrant could not be executed, it is evident that even if the accused is brought to face trial, it would impinge upon his right to a speedy trial. Due to the passage of time, a meaningful trial is unlikely, and no useful purpose would be served. 4.Accordingly, the case in C.C.No.606 of 2015 of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishanagiri, stands quashed. This Suo Motu Transfer Case is disposed of. 07.10.2025 mp Note to the Trial Court: This order is digitally signed and communicated electronically alone. The Trial Court shall take note of the order and accordingly classify the case pending before them as allowed / dismissed / disposed of, etc, and while doing so, consider any applications such as disposal of properties, etc., and pass appropriate orders, as may be necessary. Further, the Court below is directed to dispatch the copy of this order to all concerned. Page No.2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Suo Motu TR.No.11456 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. mp Suo Motu TR.No.11456 of 2025 07.10.2025 Page No.3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis