I z,¢ -_y+ e7 lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AM/ THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MA TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .|PRESENT.I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA Between : CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2354 OF 2025 -J*:i-rsS##ffi REDDY -# 1. Sn GuJI'PI'nenI Kesavulu, s/o subbanna, aged about 52 years, R/o 25/7/29, C-Block, vengalarao Nagar, Nellore, spsR Nellore Dl'strl'ct. 2 Smt GuJIPlnenl Subba'akshml, w/o GuJI'Pl'nenI Kesavulu, aged about 4N8el:ner=r=,.=r!^o+ 2517129' C- Block, venialarao ;===::';=l;ogrce: sd=Osu= Nellore Djstrl'ct. 3 Srl GuJiPInenI Subramanyam, s/o. GujJIPInenj Kesavulu, aged about 26 years, R/o. 25/7/29, C- Block, vengalarao Nagar, NeIIore, spsR Nellore Dl'strl®ct. Petitioner/Accused No.2,3&4 AND The state ofAndhra pradesh, Rep, by the publlc prosecutor, HIgh court of Andhra pradesh. Respondent/complainant =ceut=:tna nurnod<er e=.e+c^t'l: n=s_ 41:2 of _= N S S (old 43;-i r=rl :G:)l,"p-r:y=nP:at:naat:: the clrCumstances stated jn the affidavit filed Ion support of the crlmlnal petI'tl'On, the Hl'gh court may be pleased to enlarge the petltloner on ba" ln F I.R.No 416/2024, dated 21-12-2024 of vedayapalem poll'ce statl'on, spsR Nellore Dl'str,-ct. The pe{l{IOn comlng on for hearlng, upon perusing the petltl.on and the grounds flled I'n support thereof and upon hearlng the arguments of smt. K PALLAVI, Advocate for the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the followl'ng,- fzz? . .. [3327] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2354/2025 Between : Sri. Gujipineni Kesavulu, and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. K PALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: 1. The Cr'lminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the petitioners/accused Nos.2, 3 & 4 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Cr-lme No.416 of 2024 of Vedayapalem Police Station, Nellore District. te `.-S 2 2. A case has been registered against the pe{J-tl~OnerS/accused Nos.2, 3 & 4 for the offences punishable under sections 85, 80 (2) read wI-th 3 (5) BNS. 3. case of the prosecutI®On is that marrI'age of the deceased with Al was performed on 10.12.2020. At the time of marrl'age, on the demand of Al to A4, the de-facto complaI'nant gave dowry of Rs.1.00 lakh and 13 tulas of gold ornaments to them. subsequently, Al was addllCted to vI-CeS, used to spend his entl-re salary therefor, neglected the deceased and chl®ldren by developing I®llegal contacts with other ladies and A2 to A4 also supported Al and harassed the deceased both mentally and physically for additional dowry. About four months ago, the de-facto complainant gave Rs.50,000/- to Al to purchase motorcycle and while so, on 20.12.2024 at about 7.30 p.m., the deceased informed to her that Al beat her and later her son jn law called and I-nformed that the deceased was suffering from chest paI'n and he suggested swallowing gas tablet, but she denied and slept. Al woke up and tried to wake up the deceased, but she dI|d not respond, immediately, deceased was shifted to Ramachandra Reddy Hospital, Nellore, where the Doctor declared that she was already dI'ed. 4. Heard. perusedtherecord, 5. A perusal of the material available on record goes to show that a" the allegations are dI'reCted Only against accused No,1, \_i' .- _- ~ c_---- 3 Except that, there is no direct accusation that has been made against the'petitioners herein. ln so far as the petitioners are concerned, it is alleged that they have supported accused No.1. 6. In view of the aforesaid reasons, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 4. 7. Accordingly, in the event of their arrest, petitioners/accused Nos. 2 to 4 shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each, with two suret'les for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting I police officials and also on condition that the petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation as and when required and that they shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioners shall appear before the Station House Officer, Vedayapalem Police Station once in a week i.e. on every Sunday between 10.TOO a.m. and 05.00 p.m., till filing of the charge sheet. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. SQPl:+K.-I : RAJA :of^-__`-I ASsISTh-h F{ //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The V Additional District & sessions Judge, NeIIore (Court of Session : Nellore Division.I Nellore) 2. The Station House Officer, Vedayapalem Police Station, SPSR Nellore District 3. One CC to SMT. K PALLAVI Advocate [OPUC] 4ey 4. Two cos to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT] z7 5. One spare copy KJ. . HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED:27/03/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.2354 of 2025 ALLOWED :::.:-_'ii-ii-i-.=::;:i±;i-=*; :I-:3i ` - sseth_ut£#grgr `rd -...ty