Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
110
CRWP-9873-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9873-2025 Date of decision: 10.09.2025
SAISTA AND ANR. ….Petitioners
Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Aazam Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ved Parkash, Sr. DAG Haryana. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents No.4 to 5 and has filed his vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition at this stage with liberty to file the same afresh with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with aforesaid liberty.
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 10.09.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.09.11 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment