Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99753 (ALL)

NAZIM v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/34878/2025 · 2025-10-09

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34878 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Anand Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 75 of 2025, under Sections 179, 180 BNS, P.S. Roraver, District Aligarh. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated merely on the basis of recovery of fake currency of Rs. 10,500/-, though there was no independent eye witness. It is further submitted that co-accused Zikrul Hasan @ Rocky, having similar role, has already been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court in Bail Application No. 23717 of 2025. Therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused Zikrul Hasan. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 23.3.2025. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the parity of the applicant with the aforesaid co-accused. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and taking Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Achyuta Nand Pandey, Anand Prakash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nazim .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) into account that there is recovery of fake currency of Rs. 10,500/- which is not witnessed by any independent witness and also the co-accused has already been released on bail, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Nazim, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 10, 2025 Vandana BAIL No. 34878 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad