THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER SHRIRAM v. ANWAR HAJISAB ELAGI AND ORS
MFA/201455/2016 · 2025-08-14
Shivashankar Amarannavar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9973 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9973 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.201455/2016 (MV) Between: The Divisional Manager Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., E-8, EPIP, RIICO Industrial Area Sitapur, Jaipur, Rajasthan …Appellant (By Sri Subhash Mallapur, Advocate) And:
1. Anwar Hajjisab Elagi Age: 26 years, Occ: Coolie R/o Anjutagi, Tq: Indi Dist: Vijayapur-586101
2. Faroj W/o Mirasab Khaji Age: 31 years, Occ: Household R/o Anjutagi, Tq: Indi Dist: Vijayapur-586101
3. Chandsab Hajjusab Elagi Age: 23 years, Occ: Coolie R/o Anjutagi, Tq: Indi Dist: Vijayapur-586101
4. Abbasali Hajjusab Elagi Age: 20 years,Occ: Coolie R/o Anjutagi, Tq: Indi
2 Dist: Vijayapur-586101
5. Rahimbu W/o Gaffur Loni Age: 71 years, Occ: Nil R/o Anjutagi, Tq: Indi Dist: Vijayapur-586101
6. Gaffur Modinsab Loni Age: 76 years, Occ: Nil R/o Anjutagi, Tq: Indi Dist:Vijayapur-586101
7. Ninganagouda Bhimanagouda Bevoor, Age: Major, Occ: Owner of vehicle KA-37/A-2512 R/o Hosalli Village, Tq & Dist: Koppal-583231 …Respondents (By Sri Sanganagouda V. Biradar, Advocate R3 to R6; Sri Abdul Muqhtadir, Advocate for R7; R1 and R2 served) This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act praying allow the above appeal and consequently be pleased to set aside the judgment and award dated 16.06.2016 passed the MACT-II, Vijayapur in MVC NO.511/2015. This appeal coming on for Admission this day, Court made the following: ORDER Appellant’s counsel is absent. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 6 is present. On 23.09.2019 appellant’s counsel was absent; therefore, it was observed on that day that if nobody would appear on
3 the next date of hearing, appeal would be disposed of as per law. Because there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, this appeal has to be dismissed for non- prosecution. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE Srt