Hemanram v. State Rep . By The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/24581/2025 · 2025-09-12
T V Thamilselvi
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99698 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99698 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 24581 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL OP No. 24581 of 2025 Hemanram Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep . By The Inspector of Police, D-1 All Women Police Station, Coimbatore Cr.No. Not Known of 2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest at the hands of the respondent pending investigation in Crime No. Not Known of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Krishna Moorthy For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 24581 of 2025
ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 81 & 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.Not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant, Sandhya, lodged a complaint with the respondent police station, alleging that she and the petitioner had been in a live-in relationship for over a year. The petitioner married the defacto complainant on 22.08.2025 at the Mariamman Temple, Coimbatore, and subsequently threatened and abused her. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the defacto complainant, Sandhya, lodged a complaint with the respondent police station, alleging that she and the petitioner had been in a live-in relationship for over a year. The petitioner married the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 24581 of 2025 defacto complainant on 22.08.2025 at the Mariamman Temple, Coimbatore, and subsequently threatened and abused her. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Adovocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police.
6. Considering the above submissions and facts, this Court is of the view that the complaint was lodged due to matrimonial disputes, hence this Court is inclined to grant interim anticipatory bail and directs the petitioner and the defacto complaint to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre at Coimbatore on or before 10.10.2025.
7. Post the matter on 14.10.2025, till then the respondent police is
directed not to arrest the petitioner. 12-09-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 24581 of 2025 Note : 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 24581 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 24581 of 2025 To 1.State Rep . By The Inspector of Police, D-1 All Women Police Station, Coimbatore Cr.No. Not Known of 2025 2.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Coimbatore. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 24581 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. gbi CRL OP No. 24581 of 2025
12-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis