Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99697 (ALL)

AAMIR ALIAS AMIR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/32535/2025 · 2025-09-21

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32535 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Satish Trivedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Sheshadri Trivedi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 455 of 2025, under Sections 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, Police Station Naini, District Prayagraj, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR itself is delayed and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. 5. Learned counsel has next stated that no case is made out against the applicant. The applicant is stated to be the visitor of the said place where the act of immoral trafficking was taking place and all the so-called victims were major. The applicant has nothing to do with the said offence. 6. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 06.09.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey, Sheshadri Trivedi, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Aamir Alias Amir .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) liberty of bail. 7. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant-Aamir Alias Amir, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during trial. ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 22, 2025 Sumit S BAIL No. 32535 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad