143 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6366-2025 Date of decision: 11.09.2025 Naresh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Ish Kumar Khurana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Rahul Soi, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 04.08.2025 (Annexure P-21) passed by the Executing Court, Panchkula. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has very fairly submitted that the possession of the premises in question has been taken by the respondent-landlord. It is thus, submitted that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and same may kindly be disposed of as such but liberty be granted to the petitioner to raise all the pleas which are available to him in appeal filed by him. 3. In view of the above, the present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous with liberty aforesaid. 11.09.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.09.11 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document