Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 125
Rachna and another State of Punjab and others
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present :- Mr.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
The petitioners namely approached this Court under Article seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia conte petitioners are major and are staying together in live However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to respondent No.2 Pathankot as well as to respondent No.3 Station Shapurkandi, District Pathankot The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-98 Date of decision: 0
and another
VERSUS and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ . S.K. Choudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners.
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Rachna and Ajay Kumar approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia conte petitioners are major and are staying together in live However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A dated 05.09.2025 (Annexure P-4 at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot as well as to respondent No.3- Station Station Shapurkandi, District Pathankot. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9838-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 09.09.2025
...Petitioners
...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , Advocate, for the petitioners. Rachna and Ajay Kumar have 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are major and are staying together in live-in relationship. However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A 4) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the Superintendent of Police, District Station House Officer, Police The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. ...Respondents SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.09 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
125 CRWP
Pursua A.G. Punjab, appears and He has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction to Officer, Station House Officer, Police Station Shapurkandi, District Pathankot to look into the grievances of the petitio petition and also expressed in the representation dated (Annexure P-4) liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy o copy of the petition and above Station House Officer requisite compliance. 09.09.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable CRWP-9838-2025(O&M) Pursuant to supply of advance copy, , appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction to respondent No. Station House Officer, Police Station Shapurkandi, District to look into the grievances of the petitio petition and also expressed in the representation dated and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law.
The Registry is directed to send a copy o copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No. Station House Officer, Police Station Shapurkandi, District Pathankot requisite compliance. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No 2 nt to supply of advance copy, Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is respondent No.3- Station House Station House Officer, Police Station Shapurkandi, District to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 05.09.2025 and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with said representation to respondent No.3- , Police Station Shapurkandi, District Pathankot for (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.09 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document