Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9966 (RAJ)

RAMDULARI AND ANR v. STATE PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPORS

CW/14632/2011 · 2025-01-02

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:74] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14632/2011 1. Ramdulari W/o Shri Vaid Prakash Vaishnav, aged-40 years, R/o Village Khedi (Syampura), Post Batavda, Teh Bara, Dist- Bara.(Raj.), 2. Vaid Prakash Vaishnav S/o Shri Brijmohan Vaishnav, aged 36 years R/o Village Khedi (Syampura), Post Batavda, Teh Bara, Dist-Bara.(Raj.), ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bara (Raj.). 3. District Education Officer, Bara. 4. The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Kheri, Panchayat Samiti Bara, District Bara. 5. Head Master Master Govt. Upper Primary School Kheri, District Bara. 6. Dhanraj S/o Shri Laxman, aged 42 years, R/o R/o Village Khedi (Syampura), Post Batavda, Teh Bara, Dist-Bara.(Raj.), 7. Smt. Manohari Bai W/o Shri Dhanraj, aged 38 years R/o Village Khedi (Syampura), Post Batavda, Teh Bara, Dist-Bara. (Raj.), ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya for Mr. Naveen Dhuwan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 02/01/2025 1. Petitioners have filed instant writ petition way back on 17.10.2011, for their reappointment on the post of Cook-cum- Helper. 2. Counsel for petitioners submits that with passage of time, the prayer made in the instant writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, he does not want to pursue the writ petition. [2025:RJ-JP:74] (2 of 2) [CW-14632/2011] 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. 4. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/26