IN TH 274 Raman Kumar State of Punjab CORAM: HO Present: No Mr *** AMAN CHAUD 1. Pra 22.12.2021 as th 2. Fat in harness on appointment ha Director of the instructions, sta the matter and months, which address in a just 3. The found entitled, adverse to his hearing to him a redress thereupo 29.01.2025 ashok Wh Wh N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CWP-297 Date of de umar Versus unjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN None for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Gupta, DAG, Punjab. *** HAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petitio 1 as the same has been passed by the i ather of the petitioner was workin s on 20.03.2017. The claim of th ent has been rejected by the Superi of the Department, in view of w ns, states that the respondents would r and decide afresh by the competen hich this Court has no reason to b a just, fair and reasonable manner. The matter stands disposed of acc titled, grant the benefit forthwith. Ne o his interest, the same may be pass him and shall contain reasons, whereu ereupon. ( A Whether speaking/reasoned : Ye Whether reportable : Ye NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH 29780-2022 (O&M) te of decision: 29.01.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents AMAN CHAUDHARY petition is for quashing the order date y the incompetent authority. working as Class-IV employee and die of the petitioner for compassiona Superintendent Grade-I instead of of which learned State counsel, o ould not be averse to have a relook petent authority within a period of n to believe the authorities would n accordingly and if the petitioner ith. Needless to say, if the orders a e passed after granting opportunity o whereupon he shall be free to seek leg ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No er dated nd died ssionate of the sel, on elook at od of 4 uld not ioner is ders are unity of ek legal ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.30 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document