Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99651 (PNJ)

MUSKURAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/9831/2025 · 2025-09-10

Aaradhna Sawhney

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-9831-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 106 CRWP-9831-2025 Date of Decision : 10.09.2025 MUSKURAN ...Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present: Mr. Chander Shekhar Singhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shweta Nahata, DAG, Haryana. **** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner, vide which it has been prayed to issue appropriate directions to official respondents No.2 to 4 to protect his life and liberty. Further prayer has been made by petitioner to get his motorcycle bearing registration No. UP-19L-1935 released, which is alleged to have been illegally detained by the private respondents No.5 to 7. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was engaged as a labourer by private respondents No.5 to 7. Due remuneration was not paid to him and when he (petitioner) asked for his wages, his vehicle was illegally detained by the private respondents. In this context, petitioner had given representation dated 30.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) to the local police officials but till date no action thereon has been taken. He submits that for the purpose of this petition, the petitioners will be satisfied if directions are given to respondent No.3 NISHA 2025.09.11 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-9831-2025 -2- to consider and dispose of the representation dated 30.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) in accordance with law in an expeditious manner. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Shweta Nahata, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4-State. 5. After considering the respective submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the petition, without commenting on the merits thereof, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.3 – Superintendent of Police, Sonipat, to consider and decide the representation dated 30.07.2025 (Annexure P-1), within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, in accordance with law. The decision so taken be intimated to the petitioner as well. (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) JUDGE 10.09.2025 Nisha Yadav Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NISHA 2025.09.11 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document