Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99650 (PNJ)

AKASHVEER SINGH ALIAS BADAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/50641/2025 · 2025-09-15

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 225 AKASHVEER SINGH ALIAS BADAL STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. the Court, states that the petitioner is days and involved in one more case under the NDPS Act, as against none mentioned in the petition, in view of which learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the 2. 15.09.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision AKASHVEER SINGH ALIAS BADAL Versus STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Munish Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.S.Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel, as per the custody certificate filed in the Court, states that the petitioner is in custody only for 2 months and 8 days and involved in one more case under the NDPS Act, as against none mentioned in the petition, in view of which learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition Ordered accordingly. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50641-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 15.09.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. M.S.Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. Learned State counsel, as per the custody certificate filed in in custody only for 2 months and 8 days and involved in one more case under the NDPS Act, as against none mentioned in the petition, in view of which learned counsel for the instant petition, at this stage. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.15 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.