VIKRAM KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/9806/2025 · 2025-09-09
Surya Partap Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99635 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99635 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-9806
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111
VIKRAM KUMAR & ORS.
STATE OF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
SURYA PRATAP SINGH
1.
directions to and liberty It has also been prayed that directions to issued not to interfere in the married life of the petitioners manner.
2.
4.
he wants to press this petition only with regard to prayer, wherein direction 9806-2025 (O&M) 8587
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM KUMAR & ORS.
VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH
Mr. Kushager Goyal, Advocate SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners fo directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 and liberty from the respondents No.3 and It has also been prayed that directions to issued not to interfere in the married life of the petitioners
Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to
The learned counsel representing the petitioners submitted that he wants to press this petition only with regard to prayer, wherein direction 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9806-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 09.09.202
.....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners fo to provide protection for their 3 and 4 and other anti-social elements. It has also been prayed that directions to the respondents No.3 and 4 be also issued not to interfere in the married life of the petitioners No.1 and 2 in any respondents No.1 to 3 only. The learned counsel representing the petitioners submitted that he wants to press this petition only with regard to prayer, wherein direction
(O&M) .2025
.....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for their life elements. the respondents No.3 and 4 be also No.1 and 2 in any The learned counsel representing the petitioners submitted that he wants to press this petition only with regard to prayer, wherein direction GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.10 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-9806
has been sought against the respondents No.2 and 3 to dispose of a representation dated 29.07.2025 (Annexure P No.4.
5.
hereby disposed of with a direction to speaking order and P-3), moved the date of receipt of copy of instant order observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre to the petitioner District Sirsa threat perception providing required, the necessary protection be provided to the petitioner. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 9806-2025 (O&M) 8587
has been sought against the respondents No.2 and 3 to dispose of a representation dated 29.07.2025 (Annexure P
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to speaking order and decide the representation dated 29.07.2025 (Annexure 3), moved by the petitioner No.4, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre to the petitioner or the validity of their m Sirsa shall be at liberty to make threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision providing adequate security to them. Till the decision of representation, if required, the necessary protection be provided to the petitioner.
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2
has been sought against the respondents No.2 and 3 to dispose of a representation dated 29.07.2025 (Annexure P-3), moved by the petitioner Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to pass a representation dated 29.07.2025 (Annexure within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception or the validity of their marriage. The police authority of shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the and take a decision on the issue of Till the decision of representation, if required, the necessary protection be provided to the petitioner. :Yes/No : Yes/No
has been sought against the respondents No.2 and 3 to dispose of a moved by the petitioner Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is pass a representation dated 29.07.2025 (Annexure within a period of 15 days from clarified that any at perception . The police authority of of the on the issue of Till the decision of representation, if GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.10 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document