Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33111 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit, filed by learned counsel for the applicant, is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Ken Singh, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Vinod, adcocate holding brief of Sri Mukesh Baghel, learned counsel for the informant and Sri D.P.S. Chauhan, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 255 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 307, 34 IPC, P.S. Sikandara, District Agra. 4. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that for the same incident the applicant had also lodged an F.I.R. in case crime No. 254 of 2023 prior to the case in question. It is further submitted that in both the cases 12 persons have been nominated as accused and both the sides received injuries, therefore, at this stage it cannot be determined as to who were the aggressors. The applicant has explained his criminal history of one case in the affidavit. He is languishing in jail since 22.8.2025. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ken Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mukesh Baghel Pawan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 7.
Let the applicant- Pawan, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 8, 2025 Vandana BAIL No. 33111 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad