HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11498 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " a.Issue an order or direction to direct the direct the learned Civil Judge Senior Division/F.T.C., Allahabad, District Allahabad to decide the Interim Injunction Application (Paper no. 6C) in original suit No. 744 of 2022 (Ramanand Pal Vs. Smt. Vimla Devi and Others) within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge Senior Division/F.T.C., Allahabad, District Allahabad to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 22, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshul Pathak, Naresh Taneja, Shruti Taneja Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Smt. Vimla Devi .....Petitioner(s) Ramanand Pal .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad