SANDEEP KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/139/2019 · 2025-04-21
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9960 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9960 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-139-2019 Date of Decision:21.04.2025 SANDEEP KUMAR SHARMA ...Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. AG, Haryana.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
, J.
(Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 04.10.2018 passed by respondent no.5, vide which penalty of Rs.25,000/- has been imposed upon the petitioner and the same is to be deducted from his salary.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present petition, the penalty has already been deposited by the petitioner and the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same be disposed of as such.
3. Ordered accordingly.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 21.04.2025 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KUMUD VERMA 2025.04.23 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh