Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99598 (ALL)

MADARSHA JAMA-E-MAHDIA SAITHAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/21692/2025 · 2025-10-07

J J Munir, Sanjiv Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21692 of 2025 Court No. - 44 HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J. HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J. The petition has been filed in the name of a Madarsa represented by its Manager. In a criminal writ petition seeking to quash the FIR, interim relief of stay of arrest must be sought on behalf of a natural person and not a juristic entity. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks relief for quashing the FIR and stay of arrest, in the meanwhile, on behalf of the Manager of the Madarsa. Even if that is so, this petition is ill-framed. The petition is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. Let the certified copy of the FIR be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after obtaining a photostat copy of the same, duly attested by the learned counsel on record. October 8, 2025 Amit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Waseem Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Sanjiv Kumar,J.) (J.J. Munir,J.) Madarsha Jama-E-Mahdia Saithal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad