1 CR-6432-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6432-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 12, 2025 Swaranjit Singh and others ......Petitioners Vs. Ranjodh Singh and ors. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Dr. Ram Kumar Singla, Advocate and Ms. Meenu Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been preferred by the petitioners against order dated 04.04.2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby the application filed by the respondents/plaintiffs in respect of the lease/rent amount of the suit land to be paid by the respondents/plaintiffs, has been allowed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the respondents have filed the application just to create evidence to show that they are tenants whereas the respondents are not tenants and they are strangers to the property in question. He, therefore contends that the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Fatehgarh Sahib has wrongly allowed the application moved by the respondents/plaintiffs without taking into consideration the reply filed by the petitioners. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the whole file of this case with his able assistance. 4. A perusal of the impugned order shows that learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Fatehgarh Sahib has rightly held that the respondents/plaintiffs are GAURAV ARORA 2025.09.12 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CR-6432-2025 (O&M) allowed to tender rent and deposit the same in the Court, as per rate of rent alleged by them and the order shall have no bearing on the merits of the case and cannot be used to show the possession or tenancy of the plaintiffs over the property in question. It has further been rightly held that the rate of rent, the period of alleged tenancy and the tenancy itself is no where established by the permission given in the order and the order cannot be used before any court of competent jurisdiction (civil, criminal or revenue) to show the possession/tenancy of the plaintiffs over the property in question or the assertion of rate of rent or to establish the alleged tenure of the alleged tenancy. Further that deposit of any amount with the Court would not in any manner lead to inference qua the tenancy or the possession, rate of rent or tenure of rent in favour of the respondents/plaintiffs. 5. In view of the above, I do not find any infirmity or illegality in the order dated 04.04.2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Fatehgarh Sahib. 6. The civil revision petition is dismissed being devoid of any merits. 7. Pending application (s) if any also stands disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE September 12, 2025 Gaurav Arora Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No GAURAV ARORA 2025.09.12 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document