[126] Anjali Bakshish S Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] 15.10.2019 Jalandhar, declined. [2] be one un decree as c remedy. [3] prays for remedy in [4] [5] revision sh of limitatio [6] 20.01.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PU AT CHANDIGAR CR-7689- Date of De versus hish Singh and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Sunil Garg, Advocate for t Mr. Chanakya Batta, Advocate **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Judgment-debtor is in revis 0.2019 passed by the learned C ndhar, whereby, his objections to th ined. Counsel for respondent No.1 ne under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC a ee as contemplated under and thus, a Faced with situation, Mr. G s for withdrawal of the present p edy in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to say, the time sion shall be considered by the Foru mitation with respect to the said rem Amount deposited be also re .2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH -2019 (O&M) of Decision : 20.01.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN for the petitioner. vocate for respondent No.1. revision, aggrieved of order date ned Civil Judge (Junior Division s to the warrant of possession stan t No.1 submits that order passed wi CPC and the same would amount t thus, appeal would be the appropria Mr. Garg, counsel for the petitione sent petition to take an appropria time spent in perusing the instan e Forum, while considering the issu id remedy. also refunded to the petitioner. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No r dated ivision), n stand sed will ount to ropriate etitioner ropriate instant he issue RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.01.22 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document