HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33866 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. 1. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pradeep Kumar Sahi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus to command respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to take appropriate action to ensure that private respondent, who is defendant in the suit, complies with the interim temporary injunction order passed by the Tribunal. 3. It is submitted that petitioner even though has obtained an order upon an application being moved under Order 39 Rule 2-A but the local police authorities have not been helping him. 4. In the considered view of the Court, if the police authority is not helping the petitioner by ensuring the compliance of interim injunction order, he should move fresh application before the court concerned complaining against inaction on the part of police. In the event any such application is moved, the court concerned shall ensure that police helps in compliance of interim injunction order. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sonu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) disposed of. October 8, 2025 Atmesh WRIC No. 33866 of 2025 2 (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad