Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9958 (UTT)

RAMAN KAPOOR ALIAS TINU v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1998/2020 · 2025-05-15

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1998 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Karan Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Ms. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. Mukesh S. Rawat, Advocate for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, submits that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted on 25.03.2021 against the petitioner, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition has rendered infructuous, however it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 15.05.2025 SK