KM. KAJAL DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/33565/2025 · 2025-09-23
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99579 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99579 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33565 of 2025
Court No. - 77
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for parties.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.185 of 2025, under Section 137(2), 87, 61(2) BNS, Police Station Sarai Mamrej, District Prayagraj, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
6. It is also apparent from the record that petitioner no.1, namely, Km. Kajal is a minor girl and as such, custody of petitioner no.1 is hereby handed over to respondent no.4 (father of petitioner no.1) whose identity is up to the satisfaction of Sri Bhupendra Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4. September 24, 2025 Vivek Kr.
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishnu Kant Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Km. Kajal Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad