IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1740 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2021 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Sushma Devi wife of Shyam narayan singh Resident of Mohalla- Ganesh Anand Kranti Nagar, Janta Nagar Road, Near Hanuman Mandir, Bhayander West, Thane, Maharastra-401101 2. Golu @ Golu Singh Son of Shyam Narayan Singh Resident of Mohalla- Ganesh Anand Kranti Nagar, Janta Nagar Road, Near Hanuman Mandir, Bhayander West, Thane, Maharastra-401101 ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Avanish Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 09-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 304B, 498A/34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Informant’s daughter was married with Sandeep Patel in 2019. After sometime, petitioners and their family members started subjecting the victim to cruelty and harassment for non- fulfilment of demand of dowry. Informant further alleged that these petitioners and other family members assaulted his daughter who died during treatment in the PMCH on 2.7.2021. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner no.1 is married nanad of deceased, whereas Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1740 of 2025(5) dt.09-09-2025 2/2 petitioner no.2 is son of petitioner no.1. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and no specific overt act has been alleged against them. It is further submitted that the petitioners are separate in mess and business. Thrust of allegation is against the husband of the deceased who is already in custody. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let both the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Saran at Chapra in Ekma Police Station Case No. 301 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T