IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arb.Case No.100 of 2025 Date of Decision:- 11.04.2025 Shashi Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral). Counsel for the petitioner does not press the application for termination of mandate of the Arbitrator in terms of the order dated 06.09.2024 (Annexure P-3). It is submitted that the said Arbitrator was not in the knowledge of said order being passed and therefore had not entered into the reference at an earlier point of time. Having done so, the present petition has become infructuous. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s) if any, shall also stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice 11th April, 2025 (munish thakur)