Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9955 (ALL)

ASHUTOSH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/1013/2025 · 2025-01-24

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1013 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ashutosh Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K.Ojha,Vikas Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,M.N. Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of following order passed in Jyoti Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others, 2025:AHC:4441:- "1.Heard Sri Devbratt Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Saurabh learned Standing Counsel and Sri Sanjay Kumar Om on behalf of respondent no.4. 2. Petitioner before this Court is seeking appointment in view of her selection in the Second Supplementary Selection list dated 28.6.2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that neither appointment letter has been issued to the petitioner nor any reason has been communicated to her in this regard. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that there are certain legal impediments in issuing her appointment letter and he refers Educational Qualifications as mentioned in the Advertisement of Assistant Teacher. He further submitted that reasons will be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks. 5.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take legal remedy on the basis of reasons so communicated to the petitioner. 6. In aforesaid circumstances taking note of above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty. ' The above prayer is not much disputed, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with observation and liberty. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad