Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99538 (ALL)

VED PRAKASH SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14399/2025 · 2025-09-22

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14399 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing/commanding Respondent no. 2 & 3 to grant pension and other benefits alongwith interest, calculating the service rendered by the petitioner as ad-hoc service, before the regularization dated 22.03.2016, as qualifying service for pension and other dues, within stipulated period as may be specified by this Hon'ble Court. II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 & 3 to decide application dated 12.8.2025 & 1.9.2025 (Annexure No. 8 & 9) with regard to grant of pension and other benefits, though the papers has already been placed before them on 12.3.2025, in the interest of justice." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag, Mahesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ved Prakash Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri R.P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 15 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, Deputy Director of Education (Secondary), Meerut Region, Meerut is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 23, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 14399 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad