HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11548 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "I. Issue an order or direction to the court of Civil Judge (J.D) Shahganj, Jaunpur to decide the 6C Application in suit No. 135 of 2024 (Rai Sahab Vs. Atul Kumar) within stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) Shahganj, Jaunpur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 23, 2025 S. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Verma, Kamala Shanker Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Rai Sahab .....Petitioner(s) Atul Kumar Singh .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad