Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99532 (MAD)

Tata Capital Ltd v. RAVICHANDRAN S

Arb Appln/787/2024 · 2025-03-10

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb. Appln. No.787 of 2024 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.03.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb. Appln. No.787 of 2024 TATA Capital Ltd. By its Legal Manager, D. Kalaiarasan Applicant Vs S. Ravichandran Respondent For Applicant : Mr. N.K. Vanan For Respondent : No appearance – Set Ex-parte - - - - - The respondent has been duly served with the notice in this application. The vehicle, which is the subject matter of this application has been repossessed from the respondent pursuant to orders passed by this Court. 2. Since the respondent has chosen not to enter appearance in this application, he is set ex-parte by this Court. Since the prayer sought for in this application has been achieved, nothing survives for further adjudication in this application. After recording the fact that the vehicle has been repossessed, this application is disposed of. 10.03.2025 vsi2 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.787 of 2024 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. vsi2 Arb. Appln. No.787 of 2024 10.03.2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis