2025:JHHC:23847 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 5795 of 2017 --------- 1. Ranju Kumari, wife of Sri Nagendra Kumar, presently posted Assistant Teacher, U.M.S. Nawada, Katkamdag, Hazaribagh, resident of Ekram Niwas, Imli Kothi, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh. 2. Syed Manzar Hassan, son of Syed Raziuddin Ahmad, presently posted Assistant Teacher, M.S. Maheshra, Hazaribagh, resident of village Amritnagar, P.O. Korra, P.S. Mufassil, District Hazaribagh. 3. Md. Shahin Anwar, son of Md. Azmad Hussain, presently posted Assistant Teacher, UPS Banha Katkamdag, Hazaribagh, resident of 2, Suleman Colony, Lepo Road, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh. 4. Naiyar Bano, wife of late Mazharul Hassain, presently posted Assistant Teacher, U.G.P.S. Barkagaon, Hazaribagh, resident of Faizan Nagar Khirgaon, P.O., P.S. & District Hazaribagh. 5. Rajesh Kumar Ray, son of Sri Ishak Ray, presently posted Assistant Teacher, U.M.S. Garsulla, Barkagaon, Hazaribagh, resident of village Sindoor (Karkary), P.O., P.S. and District Hazaribagh. 6. Nagendra Kumar, son of late Ram Deo Singh Keshri, presently posted Assistant Teacher, U.M.S. Chano Barkagaon, Hazaribagh, resident of Ekram Niwas, Imli Kothi, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh. ......Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurga, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. and District Hazaribagh. .....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Anshuman Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-State : A.C. to G.P.-V --------- 09/Dated:-14.08.2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since he is having no instruction from his clients; as 2025:JHHC:23847 2 such, the instant application may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners that if the grievance of the petitioners has not yet been redressed, they may approach appropriate authority. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-