MUKESH THAKUR AND ANOTHER v. ASHWANI SHARMA AND ANOTHER
COPC/116/2024 · 2025-01-02
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9950 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9950 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:185 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.116 of 2024 in CWP No.3126 of 2021 Decided on: 02.01.2025 Mukesh Thakur & another
… Petitioners Versus Ashwani Sharma & another
… Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioners : Mr.Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General points out on the basis of instructions as well as pleadings on record that compliance affidavit has already been filed. When, this Court passed order dated 17.12.2024, it took note of the previous two orders dated 06.11.2024 and 21.11.2024 passed by Additional Registrar (Judicial) and the factum of the compliance affidavit being on record was ignored by Additional Registrar (Judicial) as well as this Court while passing the previous orders. However, in light of the fact that compliance affidavit is already on record, order dated 17.12.2024 is hereby re- called and as needful has been done by the respondents, these contempt proceedings, as prayed for, are ordered to be closed. Notice stands discharged.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge January 02, 2025 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?