Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 995 (CAL)

RAJDEEP SARKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/24927/2025 · 2026-02-23

Suvra Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

42 2233..0022..22002266 Ct. No.5 b.das WPA 24927 of 2025 Rajdeep Sarkar Vs. The State of W. B. & Ors. Ms. Salma Sultana Shah Mr. Sani Hossain …for the petitioner. Mr. Nirmalya Biswas Mr. Bhaskar Chakraborty …for the State. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner and report submitted by the State are taken on record. None appears for the private respondents despite service. Heard learned counsels for the parties. The petitioner alleges that the complaint lodged by him against the private respondents has not been acted upon by the police authority. It appears from the report submitted by the State that pursuant to the complaint lodged by the petitioner, prosecution has been submitted under Section 126 of the BNSS. In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioner appears to have been redressed. However, the police authority shall keep strict vigil in the area and shall ensure maintenance of peace and tranquility. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 2 Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)