MANDEEP KOUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/9800/2025 · 2025-09-09
Subhas Mehla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99498 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99498 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9800-2025 Date of decision: 09.09.2025
MANDEEP KOUR AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Dhillon, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Sunny Namdev, AAG, Haryana.
****
SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL)
1.
The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 BNSS is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful lives at the behest of respondents No.4 to 6.
2.
In this regard, this Court has already given the directions in Asha and another Vs. State of Haryana and another, CWP NO.6717 of 2009, decided on 25.07.2012 and in compliance of the same, the State Government had taken steps to protect the life and liberty of run away couple.
3.
Apart from that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 17.02.2025 also notified the SOPs for the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners in similar situations, in compliance of the Criminal Writ Petition No.12562 of 2023 titled as “Kajal Vs. State of Haryana and others”. MANISHA 2025.09.10 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-9800-2025 2
4.
In light of above directions, the petitioners are directed to approach the concerned authorities.
5.
Disposed of.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) September 09, 2025
JUDGE manisha
(i) Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
(ii) Whether reportable
Yes/No MANISHA 2025.09.10 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document