IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CRM-M-50571-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2025 Surinder Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Rahul Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that the private respondent Nos.6 and 9 after executing the sale deed in favour of the petitioner, had sold the said land along with tubewell connection to one Renu Bala-respondent No.10, regarding which, a complaint/representation dated 01.09.2025, Annexure P-3 has been submitted, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to look into the representation dated 01.09.2025, Annexure P-3, expeditiously, in accordance with law and if any threat perception is found or evidence surfaces substantiating his claim as regards to commission of a cognizable offence, after associating the petitioner, appropriate action be taken in accordance with law. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 11.09.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2025.09.11 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document