Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9947 (ALL)

SUNIL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/457/2025 · 2025-02-23

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:26469 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 457 of 2025 Applicant :- Sunil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit, filed today, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicant; learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record. 3. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.32 of 2001, under Section 366 I.P.C., P.S. Ramraj, District Muzaffar Nagar, during pendency of trial. 4. After arguing the matter to some extent, learned counsel for applicants submits that present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the applicant, namely, Sunil appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 6. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. 7. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad