HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34825 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The case of the petitioners is that he is the resident of Village-Ghatampur, Post-Kathra, Tehsil-Handia, District Prayagraj. The petitioner has submitted an application before the respondent authority for new electricity connection for the agriculture purpose. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authority is sitting tight over the matter and is not issuing the electricity connection to the petitioner despite repeated requests made by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the respondent no.2-Executive Engineer, Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Kathara Power Station, Prayagraj along with a certified copy of this order within a period of one month from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period two months thereafter. October 7, 2025 NS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Narendra Kumar Tiwari (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Rakesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad