Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99468 (ALL)

BALKESH YADAV v. SRI. RAVINDRA KUMAR, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

CAPL/5424/2025 · 2025-10-07

Dinesh Pathak

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5424 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the Tehsildar concerned has not decided the application moved by the petitioner under Section 38 of UP Revenue Code, 2006 in compliance of the order dated 30.7.2024 passed by this Court in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 1299 of 2024. 2. Perusal of the record evince that no proper application/case has been filed under Section 38 of the UP Revenue Code, 2006. The present applicant has sent the representation through registered post which is not sufficient for the purpose of initiating the proceeding under Section 38 of the UP Revenue Code, 2006. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has prayed for to dismiss the present application as not pressed with liberty to move an appropriate application/file a case before the authority concerned under Section 38 of UP Revenue Code, 2006 in compliance of the order dated 30.7.2024. 4. Accordingly, instant application is dismissed with liberty, as prayed for. October 8, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Bhan Yadav, Sudhakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Balkesh Yadav .....Applicant(s) Sri. Ravindra Kumar, District Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad