BALKESHWAR YADAV ALIAS BALKESAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2242/2025 · 2025-04-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9946 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9946 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025: JHHC:10661] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.2242 of 2025
------ Balkeshwar Yadav @ Balkesar Yadav aged about 60 years son of Manohar Yadav, Resident of Village Postiya, PO & PS Bashisthnagar, District Chatra.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. P. D. Agrawal, Advocate
------
Order No.02 Dated- 07-04-2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Bashisthnagar P.S. Case No.94 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, caused miscarriage of the child of the informant and outraged her modesty and criminality intimated the informant. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against Vikash Yadav. It is further submitted that the petitioner is an old person aged 60 years. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case, to furnish sufficient security including cash security and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be also given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as
discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in connection with Bashisthnagar P.S. Case No.94 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) RKM/