Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99446 (ALL)

MEENA BANO v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/32721/2024 · 2025-01-31

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14329-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32721 of 2024 Petitioner :- Meena Bano Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Araf Khan,Sonakshi Arora Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Mukul Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is seeking the following substantial reliefs: "I) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Respondents not to extend any kind of threat, harassment or interference in the peaceful life of the Petitioner. II. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Respondent No.1 to 3 to ensure that neither the Petitioner is harassed or threatened nor any act of violence is committed against her and to ensure her safety and security." 3. Upon perusal of the writ petition and the prayers made therein, it is clear that this writ Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition. The petitioner needs to be relegated to the authority concerned for seeking her reliefs in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned for redressal of her grievances. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 Kuldeep (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad