HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33333 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent no.3 to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the respondent no.3 feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer only to the effect to direct the respondent no.2-Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Gorakhpur to decide the pending Appeal No.D202405310000572 of 2022 expeditiously. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid appeal strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months but without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. September 22, 2025 Pramod Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Prakash, Sanjay Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Sadguru Sadafaldev Vihangan Yog Sansthan Pakadi District Ballia .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad