MEERUT COLLEGE MEERUT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VIVEK KUMAR GARG v. COURT OF ESTATE OFFICER STATION HEAD QUARTER CELL
A227/11626/2025 · 2025-09-23
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11626 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard Shri Rakesh Pandey, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :-
"to direct the respondent no. 1 to receive the application of the petitioner filed under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for impleadment in case no. 140101/PPE-Bungalow officer Station 62/11/Q3W of 2025 Estate officer Station Headquarters Cell Meerut Cantt vs. Smt. Poonam under the Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act 1971, and further be under the Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act 1971, and further be pleased to direct the respondent no.1 not to initiate, proceed/conclude proceedings prior to deciding the aforesaid application filed by the petitioner;"
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in a proceeding under the Public Premises Act, petitioner, who is the original allottee, has moved an application for impleadment. The said application has not even been received by the respondent. Averment in this regard has been made in paragraph Nos. 31 and 32 of the writ petition.
4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending.
5. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of with direction to respondent - Court Of Estate Officer Station Head Quarter Cell, to consider and decide the application filed by the petitioner before deciding the matter finally, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order and after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Astha Misra, Avneesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Meerut College Meerut Through Its Secretary Vivek Kumar Garg .....Petitioner(s) Court Of Estate Officer Station Head Quarter Cell .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad