CWP-26831-2025 with connected petitions IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 127+128+129+132+133 1. CWP PRIYANKA BAI STATE OF HARYANA AND 2. CWP PRIYA KUMARI STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER 3. CWP ANOOP STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER 4. CWP PRINCE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER 5. CWP POOJA STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER 2025 with connected petitions -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH +132+133 Date of Decision: CWP-26831-2025 PRIYANKA BAI Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CWP-26835-2025 PRIYA KUMARI Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CWP-26839-2025 Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CWP-26859-2025 Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CWP-26861-2025 Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) Aman Dua 2025.09.11 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-26831-2025 with connected petitions CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Sandeep Goyat for the TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing respondent no.2 answer sheet of the Subject Knowledge Test conducted on post of Assistant Professor (College cadre) Zoology 2. Learned counsel for the raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the to decide the pending specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior D Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent(s)/State. Goyal, Advocate with Ms. Sheena Dahiya, Advocate of respondent no.2 08.08.2025 and 20.08.2025 the Commission within a period of 5. In view of the statement made, lea petitioner(s) has no objection to the petition thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 2025 with connected petitions -2- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Sandeep Goyat, Advocate for the petitioner(s). TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) These petitions have been filed directing respondent no.2 to allow the petitioner answer sheet of the Subject Knowledge Test conducted on post of Assistant Professor (College cadre) Zoology Learned counsel for the petitioner raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner(s) will be satisfied in case pending representations, dated 08.08.2025 specified period. Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior D Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent(s)/State. , Advocate with Ms. Sheena Dahiya, Advocate respondent no.2/HPSC and submits that the pending 08.08.2025 and 20.08.2025 will be decided by Commission, by passing a speaking/reasoned a period of two weeks. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition Ordered accordingly. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of to allow the petitioner(s) to inspect the answer sheet of the Subject Knowledge Test conducted on 06.07.2025 for the post of Assistant Professor (College cadre) Zoology. petitioner(s) submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At atisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed 08.08.2025 and 20.08.2025, in a Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent(s)/State. Mr. Kanwal , Advocate with Ms. Sheena Dahiya, Advocate accepts notice on behalf the pending representations, dated will be decided by respondent no.2/Secretary of /reasoned order in accordance with law In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the has no objection to the petitions being disposed of in terms seeking a writ of to inspect the for the submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At is directed , in a eputy Advocate General, Mr. Kanwal accepts notice on behalf , dated Secretary of order in accordance with law rned counsel for the being disposed of in terms Aman Dua 2025.09.11 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-26831-2025 with connected petitions 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 8. A photocopy of this or 10.09.2025 Ad 2025 with connected petitions -3- In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioners. der be placed on the connected files. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.09.11 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document