PRABHAT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14451/2025 · 2025-09-22
Ajit Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99419 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99419 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14451 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of present petition filed under Article 226, petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no. 2 to make payment of arrears of salary of the suspension period i.e. 09.7.2009 to 6.11.2009 with interest for the post of Registration Clerk. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the above regard, petitioner has already approached before the competent authority by moving representation, but no decision has been taken. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event direction is issued to the competent authority, namely, respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner provided of course petitioner moves fresh representation. In view of aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to move fresh representation before respondent no. 2 within a period of four weeks from today and in the event any representation is made, respondent no. 2 will look into and consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same within a period of two months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. September 23, 2025 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Prabhat Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad