Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9941 (UTT)

MUNNA ALIAS CHUNNA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1436/2025 · 2025-09-24

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1436 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Sandeep Adhikari, learned legal- aid-counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The applicant – Munna @ Chunna, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 123 of 2025, under Section 309(4), 317(2), 3(5) of BNS, registered at P.S.- Kotwali Haldwani, District Nainital, has sought his release on bail. 4. In this case, FIR was lodged on 24.04.2025 by the husband of the victim, wherein he has alleged that on 20.04.2025, when his wife alongwith her son, was going from her house situated at Gorapadao towards Teenpani, two unknown persons riding bike snatched gold chain from the neck of his wife. Thereafter, on investigation, gold chain alongwith pendent was recovered from Umesh Rastogi, who owns a jewellery shop. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. State has filed counter-affidavit, wherein they have submitted that applicant has a criminal history of seven cases. 7. On this, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in some of the cases, applicant has been acquitted and rest of the cases are under trial. 8. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that there is no good ground to enlarge the applicant on bail and the present bail application deserves to be rejected. 9. The present bail application is rejected. (Alok Mahra J.) 24.09.2025 Ujjwal