Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9941 (KAR)

PARMESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/200643/2025 · 2025-03-07

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1514 WP No. 200643 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 200643 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. PARMESH S/O MALESHAPPA, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TEGINGALLI SEDAM, TQ: SEDAM, DIST: KALABURAGI – 585 222. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SIDDALING REDDY PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, KALABURAGI, DIST: KALABURAGI - 585 102. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KALABURAGI, AT KALABURAGI 584 102. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SEDAM AT SEDAM - 585 222. 5. TAHSILDAR SEDAM AT SEDAM – 585 222. 6. KARNATAKA STATE WAKF BOARD #6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, Digitally signed by BASALINGAPPA SHIVARAJ DHUTTARGAON Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1514 WP No. 200643 of 2025 VASANT NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 051. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, A.G.A. FOR R1 TO R5; SRI P.S.MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI THEREBY QUASH THE IMPUGNED MUTATION BEARING NO. MR T-42 DATED 07-09-2017 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.5 AS AT ANNEXURE-B N RESPECT OF SY.NO- 530*6 OF SEDAM VILLAGE OF SEDAM TALUKA IN KALABURAGI DISTRICT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the question involved in this petition is covered in terms of order dated 16.01.2023 in WP No. 200153/2023 and various other matters. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents do not dispute the submission. 3. Accordingly the following - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1514 WP No. 200643 of 2025 ORDER i) The writ petition is allowed. ii) The impugned entry in the record of right is set aside. iii) The response No.5 is directed to delete the name of respondent No.6 in column No.11 of ROR with respect to land bearing Sy No. 530*6 measuring 3 acres in Sedam Village, Sedam Taluk, Kalaburgi District. iv) The matter is remitted to the Tashildar to follow the procedure v) Respondent No.5 may initiate proceedings for effecting changes in the property records, if so advised in law, in which event respondent No.5 shall issue notice to the petitioner and respondent No.6 before passing any orders vi) Nothing is expressed on the merits of the claim of either of the parties. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE THM/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 29