IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (120) M/S VAISHNO INTERNATIONAL PVT. M/S HI-TECH CONSTRUCTIONS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. for the petitioner **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL 1. Petitioner has assailed the order dated 30.08.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for providing one single opportunity to defendants to cross PW1-Rajinder Singh. The case histo more than 10 years and PW1 cross-examined on number of occasions and was partly examined in 7 effective opportunities granted by the Court and thereafter, further cr the PW1-Rajinder Singh was declined vide the impugned order. 2. Considering all the facts and circumstances, there is no illegality or perversity in the order passed by learned Commercial Court but considering the fact that party shoul and there is some fault with the petitioner as petitioner failed to cross the witness on seven effective opportunities, but considering all the facts and circumstances, one effective oppor examine PW1-Rajinder Singh subject to payment of Rs.50,000/ amount of Rs.50,000/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR- Date of Decision: M/S VAISHNO INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS Versus TECH CONSTRUCTIONS -.- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Davinder Lubana, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) Petitioner has assailed the order dated 30.08.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for providing one single opportunity to defendants to cross Rajinder Singh. The case history shows that the civil suit is pending for more than 10 years and PW1-Rajinder Singh appeared as witness. He was not examined on number of occasions and was partly examined in 7 effective opportunities granted by the Court and thereafter, further cr Rajinder Singh was declined vide the impugned order. Considering all the facts and circumstances, there is no illegality or perversity in the order passed by learned Commercial Court but considering the fact that party should be afforded an opportunity to contest the cases on merits and there is some fault with the petitioner as petitioner failed to cross the witness on seven effective opportunities, but considering all the facts and circumstances, one effective opportunity is granted to the petitioner to cross Rajinder Singh subject to payment of Rs.50,000/ amount of Rs.50,000/-, Rs.20,000/- be deposited in the account maintained by IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -6280-2025 Date of Decision:-09.09.2025 LTD. AND OTHERS … Petitioners ... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Petitioner has assailed the order dated 30.08.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for providing one single opportunity to defendants to cross-examine ry shows that the civil suit is pending for Rajinder Singh appeared as witness. He was not examined on number of occasions and was partly examined in 7 effective opportunities granted by the Court and thereafter, further cross-examination of Rajinder Singh was declined vide the impugned order. Considering all the facts and circumstances, there is no illegality or perversity in the order passed by learned Commercial Court but considering the d be afforded an opportunity to contest the cases on merits and there is some fault with the petitioner as petitioner failed to cross-examine the witness on seven effective opportunities, but considering all the facts and tunity is granted to the petitioner to cross- Rajinder Singh subject to payment of Rs.50,000/-. Out of the be deposited in the account maintained by Petitioner has assailed the order dated 30.08.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, whereby the application filed by the examine ry shows that the civil suit is pending for Rajinder Singh appeared as witness. He was not examined on number of occasions and was partly examined in 7 effective examination of Considering all the facts and circumstances, there is no illegality or perversity in the order passed by learned Commercial Court but considering the d be afforded an opportunity to contest the cases on merits examine the witness on seven effective opportunities, but considering all the facts and - . Out of the be deposited in the account maintained by SAURAV PATHANIA 2025.09.10 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab State Legal Services Authority for help of flood victi be paid to respondent and the trial Court shall adjourn the case for one week granting opportunity to the petitioner/defendant to cross Singh. 3. In the light of above, the present revision petition is also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any. 09.09.2025 S. Pathania Whether reasoned / speaking? Whether reportable? Punjab State Legal Services Authority for help of flood victi be paid to respondent and the trial Court shall adjourn the case for one week granting opportunity to the petitioner/defendant to cross In the light of above, the present revision petition is also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No Punjab State Legal Services Authority for help of flood victims and Rs.30,000/- be paid to respondent and the trial Court shall adjourn the case for one week granting opportunity to the petitioner/defendant to cross-examine PW1-Rajinder In the light of above, the present revision petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No - be paid to respondent and the trial Court shall adjourn the case for one week Rajinder so