Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99391 (ALL)

MADAN GOPAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NABAIL/7820/2025 · 2025-10-09

Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7820 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Madan Gopal, with a prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 91 of 2019, under Sections- 363, 366, 504 IPC and Section 7/8 of Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station- Kadaura, District- Jalaun. 4. The applicant was granted anticipatory bail by the order dated 19.10.2020 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 8045 of 2020 till submission of police report. 5. It is on record that the charge sheet has been filed in this case on 06.04.2021 the applicant has avoided surrendering before the Court or applying for bail till now. Clearly, he has misused the limited anticipatory bail granted to him. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is devoid of merit and is hereby rejected. 6. However, in view of the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in case the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 60 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandreshwer Prasad, Jitendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Madan Gopal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. 7. With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of. 8. However, in case, the applicant does not appears before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him. 9. It is made clear that the applicant will not be granted any further time by this Court for surrendering before the court below as directed above. October 10, 2025 Rohit NABAIL No. 7820 of 2025 2 (Siddharth,J.) Digitally signed by :- ROHIT DAS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad