Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99390 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR CHAWDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/33268/2025 · 2025-09-21

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33268 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Against order dated 27.02.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jaunpur /Respondent No.3, Statutory Appeal as provided under Section 258 of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 was filed by the petitioner before the Commissioner Varanasi Division, Varanasi/ Respondent No.2. Along-with the said appeal an application for interim relief has also been filed but till date no decision has been taken, hence the present writ petition. 2. Heard counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of finally directing the Respondent No.2/ Commissioner Varanasi Division, Varanasi to decide the aforesaid application for interim relief, if possible on the next date fixed in the matter. If on account of any reason the same could not be decided on the said date then respondent no. 2 will decide the same within a period of three weeks thereafter. 4. Needless to say that the Respondent No.2, Commissioner Varanasi Division, Varanasi will decide the entire appeal, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order, unless there is no legal impediment. September 22, 2025 Swati Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Kumar Pal, Vinod Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Rajesh Kumar Chawdhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad