Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99378 (ALL)

RUSHDA @ RIHANA BEGAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/33316/2025 · 2025-10-05

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33316 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. At the very outset, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the instant petition on the ground that although petitioners have solemnized their marriage but they have not applied online to get their marriage registered and as such, present petition may be dismissed as not maintainable. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners has not disputed the fact that petitioners have not applied online to get their marriage registered. 5. In view thereof, the present petition stands dismissed at this stage. October 6, 2025 Shaswat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Rushda @ Rihana Begam And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad