Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99377 (ALL)

RUDAL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/21534/2025 · 2025-10-06

Achal Sachdev, Siddhartha Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21534 of 2025 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State- respondents. 2. Although, the prayer made in this writ petition is to quash the First Information Report dated 07.09.2025 giving rise to Case Crime No.278 of 2025, under Sections 60, 64 of Excise Act and Sections 274, 318 of B.N.S., Police Station - Kandharapur, District - Azamgarh, but at the time when the matter is taken up learned counsel for the petitioner confines his relief to grant of protection under section 35 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 3. We have perused the the First Information Report, which prima facie discloses commissioning of cognizable offence and, therefore, the prayer made to quash F.I.R. otherwise cannot be entertained in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani, (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, (2021) SCC Online SC 315. 4. We are of the view that no interference is warranted. 5. However, considering the fact that all offences mentioned in the present case are punishable with a term up to 7 years, the authorities are directed to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rudal Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. It is expected of the police not to harass the petitioner till the conclusion of the investigation in any manner whatsoever. However, the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation. 7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 7, 2025 M.S. Ansari CRLP No. 21534 of 2025 2 (Achal Sachdev,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad